I suppose brown hills would be an apt
way to describe the Coastal Range
of California, at least for those
unwilling to adapt
to concepts of beauty that differ
from their own (Can the beholder’s
eye be changed? Not if he is obstinate).
They are not hills, no,
and while mountains
is closer to the truth,
they truly are a range
of variations upon the theme
of a moving hill of gold,
fugal patterns of subtle and superb
inversion and transition,
performing for the sea and sky,
great lumps of earth heaving
in a dance of unbridled pomp,
needing no circumstance of height,
taking no airs from a lofty elevation,
with the gentle introduction
of the theme of oaks and moss
weaving their way into the grassland.
At first look or listen, precious little change.
Go and see again: the pallet
shows the depth of pale shades,
the range found in three degrees,
our language is too poor
to speak of such small riches.
Is it a waltz, my father asks,
so I count to three aloud,
and watch them lurch across
the valley floor.
Wow, I've never read a poem with a link to a song in it, so that was pretty exciting. All in all, I think I got a little distracted by it, so I'm not sure it actually helps the poem. But it's a cool idea. It's maybe not right for this poem, but I think you should try it again sometime. Honestly, I don't think you need it because you already mastered a dance-like feeling with the words. It is hard to write nature poems without doing it in predictable ways, and you have written a really beautiful nature poem. I like how it starts simple and conversational, but gets higher in language as it goes (oh, a pun!). I was stopped by "great lumps of earth heaving / in a dance of unbridled pomp." Stopped in a good way.
ReplyDelete"Our language is too poor / to speak of such small riches" is also particularly interesting. I think the end of stanza one threw me off balance, the part about the beholder and being obstinate. It just caught me off guard and didn't necessarily seem to fit. But maybe that's just me.
Good work on this poem. Your poetry is well beyond half-bad.
Anon, thanks so much for commenting, it's always a delight to see what you have to say. In looking again, I agree about the first stanza, it was an idea that came to me so I decided to put it in, but it really just doesn't belong here. I guess I'll have to find another poem for it. I also don't think that future revisions will include the link, which may shift a few other things around. I'm so relieved to hear that you think the language created the proper effect, I couldn't quite tell.
ReplyDeleteAlso, just so you know, when I wrote the blog subtitle, it was a little play on a figure of speech, not a self-pitying comment. But thanks for the reassurance anyway.