Sheep ain’t poetical,
whereas horses are.
For one, they lack
equine splendor and pomp,
which is hardly their fault,
but they don’t even try
to make up for natural deficiencies.
Have you ever seen a sheep,
ram or ewe try to take
a hedge at full gallop?
Obstinate, in the extreme,
and pretty dumb,
as they are wooly
between their ears.
Mostly, sheep just graze,
which doesn’t help their case,
horses do that as well.
Sometimes, they get sheared,
which is useful,
but poetry isn't useful,
so being sheared isn’t poetical either.
Sometimes though, they go astray,
which is pretty much the only time
they are fit subject for poetry.
The Psalmist agreed, and one or two
of the prophets,
and they were published
in the Bible, and you can’t
say fairer than that.
Maybe some of you are thinking,
but horses are useful
for getting from one place to another.
No, they aren’t.
Cars are far better, trains too,
which makes horses
somewhat outdated,
and therefore highly poetical.
did you mean to say "poetry isn't useful" in stanza 3? I like the graze/case slant rhyme in that stanza too.
ReplyDelete